On 16 Nov 2000, Christoph Rohland wrote:
> Oh, I missed one point: we need to handle the swapout of
> nonattached pages: in shm you can detach the last user and the
> segment with content is still around. So we have to scan the shm
> objects themselves also. Should We could do this in the same
> loop as we scan the mm's?
Sounds like a good idea. If we scan the nonattached segments
just as agressively as we scan the mm's, things should be
balanced just fine.
> Also we have to make sure to derefence the swap entry if the
> last reference is in the shm segmant table .
Why is this?
regards,
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
