Elena Reshetova <elena.reshet...@intel.com> wrote: > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > situations.
Although I don't see an assertion for this (the window is too small), it is possible for a dead server record to get resurrected. Take a look at afs_put_server() and note there's a check around the move to the graveyard. So, please hold this patch also. David
