Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 03:53:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
This patchset updates the kvm userspace interface to what I hope will
be the long-term stable interface. Provisions are included for extending
the interface later. The patches address performance and cleanliness
concerns.
Searching the mailing list I figured that as soons as the interface seems
to be stable, kvm should/would switch to a system call based interface.
I assume the userspace interface might still change a lot, especially if
kvm is ported to new architectures.
But the general question is: do you still plan to switch to a syscall
interface?
What benefit would a syscall interface have?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
