On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 01:05:48PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>
> If Herbert does not have a better idea, I suggest to back out this change and
> fix
> dynamically allocated key structures for the individual algorithms instead,
> for
> the older branches.
So, the solution IMHO is to revert
b2a0707817d3dec83652bb460a7775613058aedd
f382cd5ac26674877143fa7d9c0ea23c6640e706
c25e22ff51d3bebf579a054aecbaa98c81149c02
1e3f8a31f01e5967fcf413d72832ce41aa4efd1d
79adba68c32883c6559dc80040e97c35e208c7f1
82a0aa2c08de674191cf5e99b649af145c5ade25
that is the whole sequence from 82a0aa2c08de674191..b2a0707817d3dec836
backwards sans b9da7c51a11a2e7 which is a separate, unrelated fix.
This series aimed to fix the whole class of problems and creates and fixes
its own ABI breakage. But since that problem class contains exactly
1 element, fix instead the one broken algorithm with a dynamically
allocated member in its context that gets initialised during setkey.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Duwe <d...@suse.de>
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # v3.0+
diff --git a/crypto/lrw.c b/crypto/lrw.c
index 6f9908a..4c9257d 100644
--- a/crypto/lrw.c
+++ b/crypto/lrw.c
@@ -150,6 +150,9 @@ static int crypt(struct blkcipher_desc *d,
u8 *wsrc;
u8 *wdst;
+ if (!(ctx->table.table))
+ return -ENOKEY;
+
err = blkcipher_walk_virt(d, w);
if (!(avail = w->nbytes))
return err;
@@ -229,6 +232,9 @@ int lrw_crypt(struct blkcipher_desc *desc, struct
scatterlist *sdst,
BUG_ON(max_blks < 1);
+ if (!ctx->table)
+ return -ENOKEY;
+
blkcipher_walk_init(&walk, sdst, ssrc, nbytes);
err = blkcipher_walk_virt(desc, &walk);
