On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 15:30 +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > Without some other reviewed-by: or at least tested-by lines here, I'm > not going to take this. Go poke your fellow ppc people to do some > work > here, it shouldn't be up to me to do it for them :(
We are reviewing it ;-) We asked for a change in the reading of the DT "reg" property (he should use the appropriate helpers rather than do it by hand). I'll send my reviewed-by once that has been addressed. Cheers, Ben.
