On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Does this patch fix it for you?
>
> Warning: TOTALLY UNTESTED!!! Please test carefully.
Ok, I tested it with the broken image.
It looks like "readdir()" is ok now (but not really knowing what the right
output should be I cannot guarantee that). HOWEVER, doing an "ls -l" on
some of the files gets ENOENT, implying that "lookup()" still has some
problems with the image.
I suspect the code to handle split entries in isofs_find_entry() has some
simple bug, but I'm too lazy to check it out right now. Anybody else
willing to finish this one off?
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Harald Koenig
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Andries Brouwer
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Andries . Brouwer
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Andries . Brouwer
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Harald Koenig
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Andries . Brouwer
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Harald Koenig
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4) Harald Koenig
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and 2.4... Linus Torvalds
- Re: BUG: isofs broken (2.2 and... Harald Koenig

