Am 09.02.2017 13:03, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> 
> The initialisation of pointer ssp is from a dereference on sock->sk
> before sock-sk is null checked, hence there is a potential for a
> null pointer deference.  Fix this by moving the assignment of ssp
> to just before it is used in the call to smk_ipv6_check.
> 
> Detected with CoverityScan, CID#1324196 ("Dereference before null check")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
> ---
>  security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index fc8fb31..bb17387 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -2899,7 +2899,7 @@ static int smack_socket_connect(struct socket *sock, 
> struct sockaddr *sap,
>  #endif
>  #ifdef SMACK_IPV6_SECMARK_LABELING
>       struct smack_known *rsp;
> -     struct socket_smack *ssp = sock->sk->sk_security;
> +     struct socket_smack *ssp;
>  #endif
>  
>       if (sock->sk == NULL)
> @@ -2916,9 +2916,11 @@ static int smack_socket_connect(struct socket *sock, 
> struct sockaddr *sap,
>                       return -EINVAL;
>  #ifdef SMACK_IPV6_SECMARK_LABELING
>               rsp = smack_ipv6host_label(sip);
> -             if (rsp != NULL)
> +             if (rsp != NULL) {
> +                     ssp = sock->sk->sk_security;
>                       rc = smk_ipv6_check(ssp->smk_out, rsp, sip,
>                                               SMK_CONNECTING);
> +             }
>  #endif
>  #ifdef SMACK_IPV6_PORT_LABELING
>               rc = smk_ipv6_port_check(sock->sk, sip, SMK_CONNECTING);


In the hope of reducing the ifdef forrest:
 you could move the struct smack_known *rsp; and struct socket_smack *ssp; into 
the block like:

{
        struct smack_known *rsp=smack_ipv6host_label(sip);
        
        if (rsp != NULL) {
                struct socket_smack *ssp= sock->sk->sk_security;
                rc = smk_ipv6_check(ssp->smk_out, rsp, sip,
                                                SMK_CONNECTING);
                }
}


just my 2 cents ...

re,
 wh

Reply via email to