07.02.2017 03:04, Andrew Morton пишет:
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:30:38 +0300 Stas Sergeev <s...@list.ru> wrote:
So it seems my patches haven't made it into LKML
and I don't know if they made it into stable@ because
the archive link:
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable
doesn't work.
There is definitely something wrong here.
So did they pass into a stable ML?
If not, Andy can I use your Acked-by when/if resending?
Are there any known problems with MLs and the archives now?
I have a copy of [1/2] because I was on cc. I cannot locate a copy of
[2/2]. Please cc Oleg on signal-related changes.
Thanks for taking these!
2/2 had the CCs to
CC: Shuah Khan<sh...@kernel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar<mi...@kernel.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski<l...@kernel.org>
CC:linux-kselft...@vger.kernel.org
CC:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC:triv...@kernel.org
as it only changed the self-test.
Obviously I am getting spam-blocked somewhere.
I generate the CC list with get_maintainers.pl. Is this
the right thing to do?
Oleg was CCed on [1/2] as get_maintainers.pl mentioned
him.
I am attaching the [2/2] to this e-mail.
If this doesn't work, I can try to re-send it with more
CCs, but it will likely be blocked again.
>From d4dc2ac235b5a18f5bdf916152509f8b0e11276e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stas Sergeev <s...@list.ru>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 22:11:49 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tests: improve output of sigaltstack testcase
Currently it uses %i for bitmasks, which makes it difficult
to properly decode the values. Use %x instead.
Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <s...@users.sourceforge.net>
CC: Shuah Khan <sh...@kernel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
CC: linux-kselft...@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: triv...@kernel.org
---
tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c
index 1bb0125..ccd0734 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ void my_usr1(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *u)
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (stk.ss_flags != SS_DISABLE)
- printf("[FAIL]\tss_flags=%i, should be SS_DISABLE\n",
+ printf("[FAIL]\tss_flags=%x, should be SS_DISABLE\n",
stk.ss_flags);
else
printf("[OK]\tsigaltstack is disabled in sighandler\n");
@@ -122,7 +122,8 @@ int main(void)
if (stk.ss_flags == SS_DISABLE) {
printf("[OK]\tInitial sigaltstack state was SS_DISABLE\n");
} else {
- printf("[FAIL]\tInitial sigaltstack state was %i; should have been SS_DISABLE\n", stk.ss_flags);
+ printf("[FAIL]\tInitial sigaltstack state was %x; "
+ "should have been SS_DISABLE\n", stk.ss_flags);
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
@@ -165,7 +166,7 @@ int main(void)
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (stk.ss_flags != SS_AUTODISARM) {
- printf("[FAIL]\tss_flags=%i, should be SS_AUTODISARM\n",
+ printf("[FAIL]\tss_flags=%x, should be SS_AUTODISARM\n",
stk.ss_flags);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
--
2.9.3
