On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 23:52 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > > > That's true, but given a constant clock (like what sched_clock should > > have) then the accounting is similarly inaccurate. Any connection > > between the scheduler and the TSC frequency changes aren't part of the > > design AFAIK .. > > > > Well, my whole argument is that sched_clock /should not/ be a constant > clock. And I'm not quite sure why you keep bringing up the tsc, because > it has no relevance.
Then your direction is wrong, sched_clock() should be constant ideally (1millisecond should really be 1millisecond). Like I said in the last email, change the scheduler to make it aware of the variable quantum values. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
