On (02/06/17 10:48), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
[..]
> from many places:
> 
>   4x   printk_safe_flush_buffer()
>   1x   __printk_safe_flush()
> 
> 
> replacing printk_safe_flush_line() with printk_deferred() produces things
> like these
> 
>                printk_deferred("%.*s", end - start, start);
>                printk_deferred("%.*s", strlen(newline), newline);

ah... besides we need to cast length argument to "int".


> just in case, the patch (which I prefer to be ignored)

let's keep printk_safe_flush_line().

        -ss

Reply via email to