> From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:29:15AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > If we are going to create CONFIG_USB_HOTPLUG, we must -eliminate- > > > CONFIG_HOTPLUG, and create CONFIG_PCI_HOTPLUG, and > > > CONFIG_ANOTHERBUS_HOTPLUG and so on, for each hotplug bus. > > > > Argh! > > I thought the whole point of this was to make there be only > one hotplug > > strategy, due to the fact that this is a real need. > > > > Please let's not go down this path. It was all starting to look so > > nice... > > I -want- there to be only one hotplug strategy, but Adam seemed to be > talking about the opposite, with his CONFIG_USB_HOTPLUG suggestion. I told Adam that I didn't want that patch, but it's not up to me now. > I'm hoping that Linus will disagree with the splintering of > CONFIG_HOTPLUG too... And JE. > I think it's too late in 2.4.x cycle to change now anyway. And I told Adam that also. > Jeff ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
