On Wed 01-02-17 15:48:21, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Yisheng,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:06:18PM +0800, ys...@foxmail.com wrote:
> > From: Yisheng Xie <xieyishe...@huawei.com>
> > 
> > This patch changes the return type of isolate_movable_page()
> > from bool to int. It will return 0 when isolate movable page
> > successfully, return -EINVAL when the page is not a non-lru movable
> > page, and for other cases it will return -EBUSY.
> > 
> > There is no functional change within this patch but prepare
> > for later patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyishe...@huawei.com>
> > Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@kernel.org>
> 
> Sorry for missing this one you guys were discussing.
> I don't understand the patch's goal although I read later patches.

The point is that the failed isolation has to propagate error up the
call chain to the userspace which has initiated the migration.

> isolate_movable_pages returns success/fail so that's why I selected
> bool rather than int but it seems you guys want to propagate more
> detailed error to the user so added -EBUSY and -EINVAL.
> 
> But the question is why isolate_lru_pages doesn't have -EINVAL?

It doesn't have to same as isolate_movable_pages. We should just return
EBUSY when the page is no longer movable.

> Secondly, madvise man page should update?

Why?

> Thirdly, if a driver fail isolation due to -ENOMEM, it should be
> propagated, too?

Yes

> if we want to propagte detailed error to user, driver's isolate_page
> function should return right error.

Yes

> I don't feel this all changes should be done now. What's the problem
> if we change isolate_lru_page from int to bool? it returns just binary
> value so it should be right place to use bool. If it fails, error val
> is just -EBUSY.

We really want to propagate the reason why the offline operation has
failed. Why would we want to postpone that?

> > Cc: Minchan Kim <minc...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horigu...@ah.jp.nec.com>
> > CC: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/migrate.h |  2 +-
> >  mm/compaction.c         |  2 +-
> >  mm/migrate.c            | 11 +++++++----
> >  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
> > index ae8d475..43d5deb 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/migrate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
> > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ extern int migrate_page(struct address_space *,
> >                     struct page *, struct page *, enum migrate_mode);
> >  extern int migrate_pages(struct list_head *l, new_page_t new, free_page_t 
> > free,
> >             unsigned long private, enum migrate_mode mode, int reason);
> > -extern bool isolate_movable_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode);
> > +extern int isolate_movable_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode);
> >  extern void putback_movable_page(struct page *page);
> >  
> >  extern int migrate_prep(void);
> > diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> > index 949198d..1d89147 100644
> > --- a/mm/compaction.c
> > +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> > @@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone)
> >                                     locked = false;
> >                             }
> >  
> > -                           if (isolate_movable_page(page, isolate_mode))
> > +                           if (!isolate_movable_page(page, isolate_mode))
> >                                     goto isolate_success;
> >                     }
> >  
> > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> > index 87f4d0f..bbbd170 100644
> > --- a/mm/migrate.c
> > +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> > @@ -74,8 +74,9 @@ int migrate_prep_local(void)
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -bool isolate_movable_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
> > +int isolate_movable_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
> >  {
> > +   int ret = -EBUSY;
> >     struct address_space *mapping;
> >  
> >     /*
> > @@ -95,8 +96,10 @@ bool isolate_movable_page(struct page *page, 
> > isolate_mode_t mode)
> >      * assumes anybody doesn't touch PG_lock of newly allocated page
> >      * so unconditionally grapping the lock ruins page's owner side.
> >      */
> > -   if (unlikely(!__PageMovable(page)))
> > +   if (unlikely(!__PageMovable(page))) {
> > +           ret = -EINVAL;
> >             goto out_putpage;
> > +   }
> >     /*
> >      * As movable pages are not isolated from LRU lists, concurrent
> >      * compaction threads can race against page migration functions
> > @@ -125,14 +128,14 @@ bool isolate_movable_page(struct page *page, 
> > isolate_mode_t mode)
> >     __SetPageIsolated(page);
> >     unlock_page(page);
> >  
> > -   return true;
> > +   return 0;
> >  
> >  out_no_isolated:
> >     unlock_page(page);
> >  out_putpage:
> >     put_page(page);
> >  out:
> > -   return false;
> > +   return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /* It should be called on page which is PG_movable */
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> > the body to majord...@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"d...@kvack.org";> em...@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to