Ok, I noticed this went into Andrew's tree and is now in linux-next, should I resend it?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Gideon D'souza <gidisr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>#define __mode(x) __attribute__((mode(x))) > Well that's embarrassing. I so sorry for the trouble guys :( I'll resend this. > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 17:44 +0530, Gideon Israel Dsouza wrote: >>> Added __mode(x) into compiler-gcc.h as part of a cleanup task I've >>> taken up, to replace gcc specific attributes with macros. >>> >>> Last accepted patch I sent into linux-next for crypto: d8c34b949d8c: >>> crypto: Replaced gcc specific attributes with macros from compiler.h >>> >>> The last commit of this task that went through you: 52f5684c8e1ec >>> kernel: use macros from compiler.h instead of __attribute__((...)) >>> >>> The next patch is for cleaning up the m68k subsystem and it requires >>> a new macro to wrap __attribute__ ((mode (...))) >> [] >>> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h b/include/linux/compiler-gcc.h >> [] >>> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ >>> #define __attribute_const__ __attribute__((__const__)) >>> #define __maybe_unused __attribute__((unused)) >>> #define __always_unused __attribute__((unused)) >>> +#define __mode __attribute__((mode(x))) >> >> Huh? >> >> Perhaps you meant >> >> #define __mode(x) __attribute__((mode(x))) >> >> ? >>
