Sure, I believe that comments should always match the code. In this case, using either LVL_SIZE - 1 or LVL_SIZE is fine based on my understanding about 20 days ago. But I could be wrong and miss some subtle details. Anyway, my point is about readability.
thanks, On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:41 PM, John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Zhihui Zhang <zzhs...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Adjust the time start of each level to match the comments. Note that >> LVL_START(n) is never used for n = 0 case. Also, each level (except >> level 0) has more than enough room to accommodate all its timers. > > So instead of just covering what your patch does, can you explain in > some detail why this patch is useful? What net effect does it bring? > What sort of bugs would it solve? > > thanks > -john
