On Mar 11 2007 21:27, Kyle Moffett wrote: > On Mar 11, 2007, at 19:16:59, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Mar 11 2007 18:01, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> > On the other hand when __cplusplus is defined they define it to the >> > "__null" builtin, which GCC uses to give type conversion errors for >> > "int foo = NULL" but not "char *foo = NULL".
>> I think that the primary reason they use __null is so that you can >> actually do[...] > > Isn't that what I said? :-D Ya. Though I was picking at |"__null" builtin, which GCC uses to give type conversion errors for |"int foo = NULL" since C's (void *)0 would also barf when being assigned to int. So it's not a genuine __null feature ;-) Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
