On Thursday March 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:52:04PM -0800, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> > Index: linus/drivers/md/linear.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linus.orig/drivers/md/linear.c  2007-03-02 11:35:55.000000000 -0800
> > +++ linus/drivers/md/linear.c       2007-03-07 13:10:30.000000000 -0800
> > @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@
> >     for (i=0; i < cnt-1 ; i++) {
> >             sector_t sz = 0;
> >             int j;
> > -           for (j=i; i<cnt-1 && sz < min_spacing ; j++)
> > +           for (j=i; j<cnt-1 && sz < min_spacing ; j++)
> >                     sz += conf->disks[j].size;
> >             if (sz >= min_spacing && sz < conf->hash_spacing)
> >                     conf->hash_spacing = sz;
> 
> Forgot to add:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Isaacson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

And
 Acked-by: NeilBrown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thanks!

I would have replied earlier but I wanted to make sure I understood
exactly what the possible consequences of this bug were.. and they are
quite benign.
The worst possible outcome is going so far off the end of the array
that you hit un-mapped memory and Oops.

If that doesn't happen, then the next worst option is that the hash
table is sized poorly and you spend a few more cycles than needed
choosing the target device for the request (we still always choose the
right device).

Thanks,
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to