On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:42:52 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:54:41AM -0500, Steven Rostedt (VMware) wrote: > > I added a comment stating that the branch should be unlikely, but due > > to the intel drm logic, it currently isn't. Then if drm changes in the > > future, we could then try it again. > > I really don't see the point here. The unlikely() also conveys this is > not a fast path branch and that is still true, regardsless of what > runtime does. Fair enough. > > Also, the patch wouldn't apply even if I were so inclined. Probably because I created it against the ancient 4.9-rc7 kernel ;-) -- Steve
