On 01/18, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >From: lkp-robot-requ...@eclists.intel.com >[mailto:lkp-robot-requ...@eclists.intel.com] On Behalf Of kernel test robot >> FYI, we noticed the following commit: >> >> commit: e5a305ac4a5233e039586c97f4ea643a4c7dc484 ("Reimplement IDR >> and IDA using the radix tree") >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel >> .org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fnext%2Flinux- >> next.git&data=02%7C01%7Cmawilcox%40microsoft.com%7C3b615320ff5c48f >> efde708d43f40a5f9%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6 >> 36202994282292096&sdata=vMGk%2FAoZeMkABynnuEIiKM07li%2FzdZlSMM >> NmwNIGQ1s%3D&reserved=0 master > >1. I'm not entirely convinced that this is a reasonable commit to test. Due >to the way Andrew has merged a fix for this commit in a second commit, it's >expected to be buggy. Although I don't think it could cause this specific >failure pattern. Testing commit ffc87d11841ec68a44c57735ff4fada521ab5a27 >would make more sense. > >2. Ignoring the mangling that outlook has done to that URL, it's pointing >somewhere not very useful for a web browser to access: >http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/ > >Pointing to https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/ >would make more sense
Thanks for the suggestion, we'll improve it. Thanks, Xiaolong > >3. Thank you for reminding me that I need to send Andrew a complete >replacement for that patch. >
