Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 10:34:41PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Mar 10 2007 22:27, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> >On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 07:23:41PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> >> Whether the 'working config file path' should change when you do >> >> 'Save as Alternate' or not, is a menuconfig axiom. Ask Sam Ravnborg >> >> if you want it changed :-) >> > >> >Current behaviour is not logical but on the other hand I do not >> >see a big need to make it so. >> >It seems that people very seldom uses "save alternate" anyway. >> > >> >But patches are welcome. >> >> ^_^ The patch has already been posted, has not it? > No. > Either we keep current behaviour , which is misleading, > or we change to the "normal" > behaviour with a "Save as..." as know from all other programs. , which is not desirable, as long as there is no "open" and "save" option also working as "normal". IMO the option should have the "Save a copy" semantics, since that's what the name suggests. -- Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say: 51. YEEEHA!!! What a CRASH!!! Friß, Spammer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
