Hi Jeremy,

On 1/14/2017 4:01 AM, Jeremy McNicoll wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 05:02:10PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
From: Sahitya Tummala <stumm...@codeaurora.org>

Implement ->platform_dumpregs host operation to print the
platform specific registers in addition to standard SDHC
register during error conditions.

Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stumm...@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <rite...@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
index 32879b8..1241dbd 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
@@ -29,6 +29,11 @@
 #define CORE_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK                (0xf << 
CORE_VERSION_MAJOR_SHIFT)
 #define CORE_VERSION_MINOR_MASK                0xff

+#define CORE_MCI_DATA_CNT      0x30
+#define CORE_MCI_STATUS                0x34
+#define CORE_MCI_FIFO_CNT      0x44
+#define CORE_MCI_STATUS2       0x6c
+
 #define CORE_HC_MODE           0x78
 #define HC_MODE_EN             0x1
 #define CORE_POWER             0x0
@@ -77,6 +82,10 @@
 #define CORE_HC_SELECT_IN_HS400        (6 << 19)
 #define CORE_HC_SELECT_IN_MASK (7 << 19)

+#define CORE_VENDOR_SPEC_FUNC2         0x110
+#define CORE_VENDOR_SPEC_ADMA_ERR_ADDR0        0x114
+#define CORE_VENDOR_SPEC_ADMA_ERR_ADDR1        0x118
+
 #define CORE_CSR_CDC_CTLR_CFG0         0x130
 #define CORE_SW_TRIG_FULL_CALIB                BIT(16)
 #define CORE_HW_AUTOCAL_ENA            BIT(17)
@@ -658,6 +667,30 @@ static int sdhci_msm_hs400_dll_calibration(struct 
sdhci_host *host)
        return ret;
 }

+static void sdhci_msm_dumpregs(struct sdhci_host *host)
+{
+       struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
+       struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
+
+       pr_err("----------- PLATFORM REGISTER DUMP -----------\n");
+
+       pr_err("Data cnt: 0x%08x | Fifo cnt: 0x%08x | Int sts: 0x%08x | Int sts2: 
0x%08x\n",
+              readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_MCI_DATA_CNT),
+              readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_MCI_FIFO_CNT),
+              readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_MCI_STATUS),
+              readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_MCI_STATUS2));
+       pr_err("DLL cfg:  0x%08x | DLL sts:  0x%08x | SDCC ver: 0x%08x\n",
+              readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_CONFIG),
+              readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_DLL_STATUS),
+              readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_MCI_VERSION));
+       pr_err("Vndr func: 0x%08x | Vndr adma err : addr0: 0x%08x addr1: 
0x%08x\n",
+              readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC),
+              readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC_ADMA_ERR_ADDR0),
+              readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC_ADMA_ERR_ADDR1));
+       pr_err("Vndr func2: 0x%08x\n",
+              readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + CORE_VENDOR_SPEC_FUNC2));
+}
+

Why did you omit the printing of CORE_TESTBUS_CONFIG like that of
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442449/
Actually testbus registers aren't something we analyze every-time.
So I have skipped it for now. We can add it later if and when required.



and sdhci_dump_state() was dropped too.  Being able to dump the rpm_info
was very handy for issues I was running into.
Sure, let me add that info as well.


-jeremy

 static int sdhci_msm_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode)
 {
        int tuning_seq_cnt = 3;
@@ -1035,6 +1068,7 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, 
unsigned int clock)
        .set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
        .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_msm_set_uhs_signaling,
        .voltage_switch = sdhci_msm_voltage_switch,
+       .platform_dumpregs = sdhci_msm_dumpregs,
 };

 static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_msm_pdata = {
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.


--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to