On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Heh, this is what Al was saying ;) > > I'm fine with that, but how about counter cycles (going back to zero)? > > Just use u64?
Yeah, the second patch was using an u64. I ended up using a "class" name (signalfd, timerfd, asyncfd) as dname entry. An incremental counter would not add any useful information, and noone will ever care about dentry name of those objects. Prolly the class name is the only thing you might want to know, or we can drop even that and use a shared dentry for everything. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
