On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:17:33PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:37:01PM +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > Balbir pointed out that in idle_book3s.S and powernv/idle.c some > > functions and variables had power9 in their names while some others > > had arch300. > > > > I would prefer power9 to arch300 >
I don't have a strong preference for arch300 vs power9, will change it to power9 if that looks better. -- Thanks and Regards gautham.
