There are lots of #ifdefs in this file, and a recent patch got one
of them wrong, leading to a harmless warning in some randconfig
builds:
ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:4956:21: error: 'bnxt_get_max_func_vnics' defined
but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:4947:21: error: 'bnxt_get_max_func_rss_ctxs'
defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
Ideally we'd just remove all of them and use 'if (IS_ENABLED())'
checks instead, which don't have this problem, but for now, I'm
adding one more #ifdef to shut up the new warning.
Fixes: 8079e8f107bf ("bnxt_en: Refactor code that determines RFS capability.")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 7bd2a85694dd..c0918507fdb4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -4944,6 +4944,7 @@ static int bnxt_setup_int_mode(struct bnxt *bp)
return rc;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
static unsigned int bnxt_get_max_func_rss_ctxs(struct bnxt *bp)
{
#if defined(CONFIG_BNXT_SRIOV)
@@ -4961,6 +4962,7 @@ static unsigned int bnxt_get_max_func_vnics(struct bnxt
*bp)
#endif
return bp->pf.max_vnics;
}
+#endif
unsigned int bnxt_get_max_func_stat_ctxs(struct bnxt *bp)
{
--
2.9.0
