On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:08:23 +0100 Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/21/2016 01:45 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Some raw NAND function names conflict with names defined in nand.h. > > Prefix all those functions with nandc (for nand chip) instead of nand so > > we can include nand.h from rawnand.h > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com> > > Nit, nand and nandc is quite confusing, why not call it nand_chip in full? > Indeed, the name is confusing as hell, I just tried to keep it short but that's probably not a good idea. Maybe I should just prefix/suffix the new functions with nanddev instead of changing the existing ones. What do you think?
