On 10 January 2017 at 02:31, Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:42 PM, SF Markus Elfring > <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > >> From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net> >> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 18:44:26 +0100 >> >> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation >> indicated that an array data structure should be processed. >> Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array". >> >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. >> >> * Replace the specification of a data structure by a pointer dereference >> to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to >> the Linux coding style convention. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net> > > Chunyan has been running this test code so she might have additional > insights to provide. I am not aware about anyone else really running the > tests, are there people who do it?
I talked about mmc_test on #armlinux channel with a person whose nickname was s84 other day. It seemed that s84 was also trying to use mmc_test module. Regards, Chunyan > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> > > Yours, > Linus Walleij
