On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 01:56:23PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Am 16.12.2016 um 16:10 schrieb Radim Krčmář:
> >irqchip_in_kernel() tried to save a bit by reusing pic_irqchip(), but it
> >just complicated the code.
> >Add a separate state for the irqchip mode.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
> >---
> > v2: change two bools into one enum and rename everything [Paolo]
> >---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +++++++-
> > arch/x86/kvm/irq.h | 15 ++++++++-------
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 5 +++--
> > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >index 7892530cbacf..d3acd295446d 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >@@ -715,6 +715,12 @@ struct kvm_hv {
> > HV_REFERENCE_TSC_PAGE tsc_ref;
> > };
> >
> >+enum kvm_irqchip_mode {
> >+ KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE,
> >+ KVM_IRQCHIP_KERNEL, /* created with KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP */
> >+ KVM_IRQCHIP_SPLIT, /* created with KVM_CAP_SPLIT_IRQCHIP */
>
> Was wondering if FULL/SPLIT would be a better naming. However I also
> find irqchip_kernel() vs irqchip_in_kernel() slightly confusing.
Me too. Since we have kvm_irqchip_mode enum above, how about renaming
irqchip_{kernel|split}() into irqchip_mode_{kernel|split}()?
Sorry for such a late comment...
-- peterx
