On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 15:11 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> [+Yong Wu for mtk_iommu]
>
> On 03/01/17 17:34, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > With the introduction of the new iommu_{register/get}_instance()
> > interface in commit e4f10ffe4c9b ("iommu: Make of_iommu_set/get_ops() DT
> > agnostic") (based on struct fwnode_handle as look-up token, so firmware
> > agnostic) to register IOMMU instances with the core IOMMU layer there is
> > no reason to keep the old OF based interface around any longer.
> >
> > Convert all the IOMMU drivers (and OF IOMMU core code) that rely on the
> > of_iommu_{set/get}_ops() to the new kernel interface to register/retrieve
> > IOMMU instances and remove the of_iommu_{set/get}_ops() remaining glue
> > code in order to complete the interface rework.
>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>
>
> Looking at before-and-after disassemblies, of_iommu.o is binary
> identical, and exynos-iommu.o differs only in the use of dev->fwnode
> rather than &dev->of_node->fwnode (and is binary identical if I hack it
> back to the latter). I'm not sure why the (GCC 6.2) codegen for
> mtk_iommu.o changes quite so much when merely replacing a callsite with
> the contents of its static inline callee, but it does :/
>
> Robin.
>
For MTK IOMMU,
Tested-by: Yong Wu <yong...@mediatek.com>
Thanks.
