On 01/06/17 02:44, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Junichi Nomura <j-nom...@ce.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>> We allocate struct ucode_patch here.
>>
>> "size" is a size of microcode data and used for kmemdup() later
>> in this function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nom...@ce.jp.nec.com>
>> Fixes: 06b8534cb728 ("x86/microcode: Rework microcode loading")
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
>> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
>> index aee3cb5..042f329 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
>> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static struct ucode_patch *__alloc_microcode_buf(void
>> *data, unsigned int size)
>> {
>> struct ucode_patch *p;
>>
>> - p = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + p = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ucode_patch), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Perhaps sizeof(*p) ?
Yeah, that might be preferred.
>> if (!p)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
--
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation / NEC Solution Innovators, Ltd.
