Ingo Molnar wrote: > /For you/ it's certainly no big deal, you dont have to fix it up and you > dont have to keep it flexible ;) >
How flexible does it need to be? Its a simple time source and event driver. How flexible does the pit driver need to be? It's just a small leaf node hanging off a large existing piece of kernel infrastructure. > and really, i'm not expecting miracles, i've never seen any hardware > vendor argue /against/ support for their own hardware =B-) > And since when has it been kernel policy to argue against including a well written, self-contained, vendor-provided driver for a piece of hardware? J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/