On 20/12/16 21:22, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:07:50AM +0000, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
>>
>> rmi_dev is currently being dereferenced before it null checked, so we
>> have a potential null pointer dereference issue with this. Fix this
>> by dereferencing rmi_dev after a null check has been performed.
>>
>> Fixes CoverityScan CID 1391218 ("Dereference before null check")
>
> I'd rather we removed the NULL check instead. As far as I can see it
> can't even be NULL.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f03.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f03.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f03.c
>> index 8a7ca3e..008f42a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f03.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f03.c
>> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int rmi_f03_config(struct rmi_function *fn)
>> static int rmi_f03_attention(struct rmi_function *fn, unsigned long
>> *irq_bits)
>> {
>> struct rmi_device *rmi_dev = fn->rmi_dev;
>> - struct rmi_driver_data *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&rmi_dev->dev);
>> + struct rmi_driver_data *drvdata;
>> struct f03_data *f03 = dev_get_drvdata(&fn->dev);
>> u16 data_addr = fn->fd.data_base_addr;
>> const u8 ob_len = f03->rx_queue_length * RMI_F03_OB_SIZE;
>> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static int rmi_f03_attention(struct rmi_function *fn,
>> unsigned long *irq_bits)
>> if (!rmi_dev)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> + drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&rmi_dev->dev);
>> if (drvdata->attn_data.data) {
>> /* First grab the data passed by the transport device */
>> if (drvdata->attn_data.size < ob_len) {
>> --
>> 2.10.2
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
Ignore this patch, correct fix just sent.
