On 19 December 2016 at 10:24, Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 06:57:27PM +0000, Sami Kerola wrote:
>> An attempt to freeze a filesystem that does not support such operation is
>> reported as EOPNOTSUPP to user.  Running unfreeze to the same filesystem
>> returns EINVAL.  Later is a little misleading, users can mix that message
>> with return value from unfreezing when filesystem is not frozen.
>
> This is going to break gfs2 with it's odd ->that_super method.

Thank you for feedback, there's just one small problem with it.  I don't
quite understand the breakage.

Proposed change uses similar logic as ioctl_fsfreeze()[1] and it works fine.
If I am not entirely mistaking freeze and thaw hooks where added[2] to avoid
issues with gfs2.  And looking gfs2 super_operations init[3] does not make
me any wiser what might be wrong.

Maybe feedback had typo s/that_super/thaw_super/[4].  But even then it is
unclear to me how a null could cause breakage.

[1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/ioctl.c#L553
[2] 
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/48b6bca6b7b8309697fc8a101793befe92d249d9
[3] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/gfs2/super.c#L1683
[4] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/super.c#L1446

-- 
Sami Kerola
http://www.iki.fi/kerolasa/

Reply via email to