On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:22:52AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> ok. What do you think about the sys_remap_file_pages_prot() thing that >>> Paolo has done in a nicely split up form - does that complicate things >>> in any fundamental way? That is what is useful to UML.
* Bill Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Oracle would love it. You don't want to know how far back I've been >> asked to backport that. On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:35:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > ok, cool! Then the first step would be for you to talk to Paolo and to > pick up the patches, review them, nurse it in -mm, etc. Suffering in > silence is just a pointless act of masochism, not an efficient > upstream-merge tactic ;-) It was intended for use in a debugging mode for the database, so given the general mood where fighting backouts was an issue, I was relatively loath to bring it up. With UML behind it I don't feel that's as much of a concern. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
