On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:47:19AM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > > Control group control? The word control has a specific meaning for > > cgroups and that second control doesn't make much sense to me. > > But this would go against the long tradition of RAS syndrome and > things like "struct task_struct". :)
Well, now that you put it that way, it's starting to look good. :) But, let's just go for CAP_CGROUP if everyone is okay with it. Thanks. -- tejun
