On 2016-12-09 23:40, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> On 2016-12-08 22:57, Cong Wang wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > I also tried to extend Cong Wang's idea to attempt to proactively
> >>> > respond to a
> >>> > NETLINK_URELEASE on the audit_sock and reset it, but ran into a locking
> >>> > error
> >>> > stack dump using mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex) in the notifier callback.
> >>> > Eliminating the lock since the sock is dead anways eliminates the error.
> >>> >
> >>> > Is it safe? I'll resubmit if this looks remotely sane. Meanwhile I'll
> >>> > try to
> >>> > get the test case to compile.
> >>>
> >>> It doesn't look safe, because 'audit_sock', 'audit_nlk_portid' and
> >>> 'audit_pid'
> >>> are updated as a whole and race between audit_receive_msg() and
> >>> NETLINK_URELEASE.
> >>
> >> This is what I expected and why I originally added the mutex lock in the
> >> callback... The dumps I got were bare with no wrapper identifying the
> >> process context or specific error, so I'm at a bit of a loss how to
> >> solve this (without thinking more about it) other than instinctively
> >> removing the mutex.
> >
> > Netlink notifier can safely be converted to blocking one, I will send
> > a patch.
> >
> > But I seriously doubt you really need NETLINK_URELEASE here,
> > it adds nothing but overhead, b/c the netlink notifier is called on
> > every netlink socket in the system, but for net exit path, that is
> > relatively a slow path.
> >
> > Also, kauditd_send_skb() needs audit_cmd_mutex too.
>
> Please let me know what you think about the attached patch?
>
> Thanks!
> commit a12b43ee814625933ff155c20dc863c59cfcf240
> Author: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri Dec 9 17:56:42 2016 -0800
>
> audit: close a race condition on audit_sock
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index f1ca116..ab947d8 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -423,6 +423,8 @@ static void kauditd_send_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> snprintf(s, sizeof(s), "audit_pid=%d reset",
> audit_pid);
> audit_log_lost(s);
> audit_pid = 0;
> + audit_nlk_portid = 0;
> + sock_put(audit_sock);
> audit_sock = NULL;
> } else {
> pr_warn("re-scheduling(#%d) write to
> audit_pid=%d\n",
> @@ -899,6 +901,9 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> nlmsghdr *nlh)
> audit_log_config_change("audit_pid", new_pid,
> audit_pid, 1);
> audit_pid = new_pid;
> audit_nlk_portid = NETLINK_CB(skb).portid;
> + sock_hold(skb->sk);
> + if (audit_sock)
> + sock_put(audit_sock);
> audit_sock = skb->sk;
> }
> if (s.mask & AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT) {
> @@ -1167,10 +1172,6 @@ static void __net_exit audit_net_exit(struct net *net)
> {
> struct audit_net *aunet = net_generic(net, audit_net_id);
> struct sock *sock = aunet->nlsk;
> - if (sock == audit_sock) {
> - audit_pid = 0;
> - audit_sock = NULL;
> - }
So how does this not leak memory leaving the sock refcount incremented
by the registered audit daemon when that daemon shuts down normally?
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com>
Kernel Security Engineering, Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
