On Saturday 03 March 2007, Bill Irwin wrote: >> If you have a known-working kernel version, git-bisect might help you >> track down where it was introduced. Given the messages prior to the >> hugetlbpage.c BUG_ON I'd say that this is something else besides the >> specific code listed by line number,
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:45:23PM +0300, Alexander Y. Fomichev wrote: > Nop, seems like it is hugetlb bug fixed by Adam > commit 516dffdcd8827a40532798602830dfcfc672294c > [PATCH] Fix get_unmapped_area and fsync for hugetlb shm segments > I've disregard it thoughtlessly so Adam marks it specific for powerpc/ia64. > (hmm.. i donno realy why, huge pages should be alined anyway and if i > understend it correctly it may not be if is_file_hugepages() fails) > As of "junk" just before the BUG this again IIUC because o-direct staff > catches this issue before hugetlb. I'm not terribly surprised. The issue Adam fixed is relatively easily triggered. Bisecting probably wouldn't have been useful, sorry. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
