> 1 дек. 2016 г., в 0:30, Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> написал(а): > > 1st and 2nd are ambiguous. Plus this is an OS implementation detail that > doesn't belong in the binding. > >> +If you want to bind specific timer as clockevent (i.e. one from alive >> subsystem) >> +and specific timer as clocksource, you can number the timers in "aliases" >> node. > > No. > > Use and/or describe what are the features of a timer to make the > decision. There has to be some reason you care which one. One has an > interrupt and the other doesn't. One is always on. Etc.
Thank you, Rob. Eventually I abandoned this decision. I left only one patch, which you confirmed recently. And sorry for making noise with duplicate patches. Alexander.
