Alexander Viro wrote: > It's not a good idea, it's an obvious fact. Oh, you mean forking the tree? Again I find your terminology at odds with mine; what do you mean by forking the tree? I get the impression that it's a very restrictive notion where any functional ehancement applied as a patch on top of a standard distribution kernel is considered by you as forking? Is that so? (And BTW by patch I mean input to the patch command.) Richard Moore - RAS Project Lead - Linux Technology Centre (PISC). http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux Office: (+44) (0)1962-817072, Mobile: (+44) (0)7768-298183 IBM UK Ltd, MP135 Galileo Centre, Hursley Park, Winchester, SO21 2JN, UK - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (G... Alexander Viro
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interfac... Michael Rothwell
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Inte... Alexander Viro
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interfac... David Lang
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI) richardj_moore
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI) richardj_moore
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI) richardj_moore
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI) richardj_moore
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (G... Andi Kleen
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interfac... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI) richardj_moore
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI) richardj_moore
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI) richardj_moore
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (G... Matt D. Robinson
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI) richardj_moore