On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Jonathan Cameron <ji...@kernel.org> wrote: > On 26/11/16 03:47, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
[bmp280.c] >> /* Wait to make sure we started up properly */ >> - mdelay(data->start_up_time); >> + usleep_range(data->start_up_time, data->start_up_time + 100); > > As this in probe I doubt we really care. Could just set it longer to shut up > the warnings. > Still would like some input from say Linus on this... Hm, I don't think it's a big issue... this works too it just looks overworked. On the runtime_resume() path we use msleep() instead which I guess is why it is not changed in this patch, but they have the same purpose. Yours, Linus Walleij
