On Monday 05 March 2007, Matt Mackall wrote: >On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 06:06:22PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: >> + * This is the time all tasks within the same priority round robin. >> + * Set to a minimum of 6ms. >> */ >> +#define RR_INTERVAL ((6 * HZ / 1001) + 1) > >What happens with small HZ? Like 100? I suppose 10ms is a reasonable >number here. But in general, how well does this scheduler do without a >time source other than jiffies?
I don't personally know, but another poster I recall did say he was using a slow clock and it worked great so you might backtrack in this thread. I'm using the 1k clock here. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
