On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:44:19AM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov, at 12:42:43PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > IIRC, and my pounding head really doesn't remember much, the comment > > reads like we need the large fudge factor because hackbench. That is, > > hackbench would like this test to go away, but others benchmarks will > > tank. > > > > Now, if only I would've written down which benchmarks that were.. awell. > > Going out on a limb: Chris' schbench?
No, that actually wants that test taken out as well. It might have been things like sysbench or so.
