* Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
> This patch rectifies a comment present in sugov_irq_work() function to
> follow proper grammar.
>
> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 42a220e78f00..71e1a980d40a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -315,15 +315,15 @@ static void sugov_irq_work(struct irq_work *irq_work)
> sg_policy = container_of(irq_work, struct sugov_policy, irq_work);
>
> /*
> + * For Real Time and Deadline tasks, the schedutil governor shoots the
> + * frequency to maximum. Special care must be taken to ensure that this
> + * kthread doesn't result in the same behavior.
> *
> * This is (mostly) guaranteed by the work_in_progress flag. The flag is
> + * updated only at the end of the sugov_work() function and before that
> + * the schedutil governor rejects all other frequency scaling requests.
> *
> + * There is a very rare case though, where the RT thread yields right
> * after the work_in_progress flag is cleared. The effects of that are
> * neglected for now.
> */
Also:
s/Real Time task/RT task
s/Deadline task/deadline task
With those:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
