On 11/23/2016 05:12 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Wednesday 23 November 2016 08:59 AM, David Lechner wrote:
This SoC has a separate pin controller for configuring pullup/pulldown
bias on groups of pins.
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <da...@lechnology.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
index 8945815..1c0224c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
@@ -210,6 +210,11 @@
};
};
+ pinconf: pin-controller@22c00c {
+ compatible = "ti,da850-pupd";
+ reg = <0x22c00c 0x8>;
+ status = "disabled";
+ };
Can you please place this below the i2c1 node. I am trying to keep the
nodes sorted by unit address. I know thats broken in many places today,
but lets add the new ones where they should eventually end up.
I can do this, but it seems that the predominant sorting pattern here is
to keep subsystems together (e.g. all i2c are together, all uart are
together, etc.)
Would a separate patch to sort everything by unit address to get this
cleaned up be acceptable?
Thanks,
Sekhar
