On 11/22/2016 02:20 AM, Y.T. Tang wrote: > Hi Scott, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Scott Wood [mailto:o...@buserror.net] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 2:54 PM >> To: Y.T. Tang <yuantian.t...@nxp.com>; mturque...@baylibre.com >> Cc: sb...@codeaurora.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Scott Wood >> <scott.w...@nxp.com>; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- >> ker...@lists.infradead.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qoriq: added ls1012a clock configuration >> >> On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 13:58 +0800, yuantian.t...@nxp.com wrote: >>> From: Tang Yuantian <yuantian.t...@nxp.com> >>> >>> Added ls1012a clock configuation information. >> >> Do we really need the same line in the changelog twice? >> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <yuantian.t...@nxp.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/clk/clk-qoriq.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-qoriq.c b/drivers/clk/clk-qoriq.c index >>> 1bece0f..563d874 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-qoriq.c >>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-qoriq.c >>> @@ -202,6 +202,14 @@ static const struct clockgen_muxinfo ls1021a_cmux >> = { >>> } >>> }; >>> >>> +static const struct clockgen_muxinfo ls1012a_cmux = { >>> + { >>> + [0] = { CLKSEL_VALID, CGA_PLL1, PLL_DIV1 }, >>> + {}, >>> + [2] = { CLKSEL_VALID, CGA_PLL1, PLL_DIV2 }, >>> + } >>> +}; >>> + >> >> Based on the "ls1021a_cmux" in the context it looks like this patch is >> intended to apply on top >> of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8923541/ but I don't see any mention >> of that. >> > I saw this patch had been merged already. > > Regards, > Yuantian
I don't see it in linux-next. -Scott
