From: john stultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:24:00 -0800
> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 12:32 -0800, David Miller wrote: > > From: john stultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:58:11 -0800 > > > > > Oh! Sorry! Yea, looking at it more the ioremap isn't actually necessary, > > > as we can use hpet_readl() instead of re-calculating the hpet base > > > address pointer. > > > > > > I'll fix this up (and find an HPET enabled x86_64 box to test it on) and > > > get a patch to you shortly. > > > > Not to pressure you John but I'd really like to see this go > > in soon, it does fix real bugs such as the Radeon FB issue > > I pointed out the other week. > > Here's my second try at this. This time I caught three bugs from the > last patch (all in x86_64): > 1) Calling ioremap too early in the HPET code (which is unnecessary) > 2) hpet_period local variable aliasing > 3) forgot to re-add call to init_tsc_clocksource() > > I boot tested on two x86_64 boxes (one ACPI PM and the other HPET). > However it probably should still go through a bit of testing in -mm to > make sure all the quirks are shaken out. Agreed and it looks good to me after going over it a few times. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
