Hi Hans,

On 11/14/2016 12:25 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 11/14/2016 11:11 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> <cut>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +void vidc_vb2_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue *q)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +        struct venus_inst *inst = vb2_get_drv_priv(q);
>>>>>> +        struct venus_core *core = inst->core;
>>>>>> +        struct device *dev = core->dev;
>>>>>> +        struct vb2_queue *other_queue;
>>>>>> +        struct vidc_buffer *buf, *n;
>>>>>> +        enum vb2_buffer_state state;
>>>>>> +        int ret;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +        if (q->type == V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE)
>>>>>> +                other_queue = &inst->bufq_cap;
>>>>>> +        else
>>>>>> +                other_queue = &inst->bufq_out;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +        if (!vb2_is_streaming(other_queue))
>>>>>> +                return;
>>>>>
>>>>> This seems wrong to me: this return means that the buffers of queue q are 
>>>>> never
>>>>> released. Either drop this 'if' or release both queues when the last queue
>>>>> stops streaming. I think dropping the 'if' is best.
>>>>
>>>> I have done this way because hfi_session_stop must be called only once,
>>>> and buffers will be released on first streamoff for both queues.
>>>
>>> Are you sure the buffers are released for both queues? I may have missed 
>>> that when
>>> reviewing.
>>
>> yes, hfi_session_stop will instruct the firmware to stop using provided
>> buffers and return ownership to the host driver by fill_buf_done and
>> empty_buf_done callbacks.
>>
>>>
>>> I would recommend to call hfi_session_stop when the first stop_streaming is 
>>> called,
>>> not when it is called for both queues. I say this because stopping 
>>> streaming without
>>> releasing the buffers is likely to cause problems.
>>
>> this is what I tried to implement with above
>> !vb2_is_streaming(other_queue) thing.
> 
> That doesn't work: if the application calls STREAMON(CAPTURE) followed by 
> STREAMOFF(CAPTURE)
> without ever starting the OUTPUT queue, this will not clean up the capture 
> queue.

Yes this is a bug which should be fixed.

-- 
regards,
Stan

Reply via email to