On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > +atomic variables such atomic_t or struct kref: > + > + %pAr atomic_t count > + %pAk struct kref count
Not a huge fan. That "r" makes sense to you ("raw" atomic), but it makes no sense to a user. An atomic isn't "raw" to anybody else. It's just an atomic. Also, we have 'atomic64_t", which this doesn't cover at all. I'd suggest just %pA, %pA64, %pAkref or something. Which leaves us the choice to add more atomic versions later without having to make up random one-letter things that make no sense. Linus