On 14-11-16, 10:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Any static prio value is wrong (static prio assignment requires system > knowledge that the kernel doesn't and cannot have), 50 is what threaded > IRQs default too as well IIRC, so it would at least be consistent with > that.
Yes you are correct and I have found a better way of defining the priority in this case using that code instead of magic figure 50. MAX_USER_RT_PRIO/2 :) -- viresh
