On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:32:42PM +0100, Ingo Molnar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> * Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [...] that is why number for kevent is higher - it uses edge-triggered
> > handler (which you asked to remove from epoll), [...]
>
> no - i did not 'ask' it to be removed from epoll, i only pointed out
> that with edge-triggered the results were highly unreliable here and
> that with level-triggered it worked better. Just to make sure: if you
> put back edge-triggered into evserver_epoll.c, do you get the same
> numbers, and is CPU utilization still the same 98-100%?
No.
_Now_ it is about 1500-2000 req/sec with 10-20% CPU utilization.
Number of 'Total transferred' and 'HTML transferred' does
not equal to 80000 multiplied by size of the page.
That are strange tests actually - I managed to get 9000 requests per
second from epoll server (only once!) and 8900 from kevent (two times
only), sometimes they both drop down to 2300-2700 req/s.
> Ingo
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
