palmas_dev and palmas_power_off are always assigned together.
So the check for palmas_dev inside palmas_power_off function
is redundant. Removing the same.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
drivers/mfd/palmas.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
index 8f8bacb..ee9e9ea 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c
@@ -431,9 +431,6 @@ static void palmas_power_off(void)
unsigned int addr;
int ret, slave;
- if (!palmas_dev)
- return;
-
slave = PALMAS_BASE_TO_SLAVE(PALMAS_PMU_CONTROL_BASE);
addr = PALMAS_BASE_TO_REG(PALMAS_PMU_CONTROL_BASE, PALMAS_DEV_CTRL);
--
1.9.1
