On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 21:06:50 +0100 > Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <dan...@bristot.me> wrote: > > > The throttling allowed the kworker to run, but once the kworker went to > > sleep, the RT tasks started to work again. In the previous behavior, > > the system would either go idle, or the kworker would starve because > > the runtime become infinity for RR tasks. > > I'm confused? Are you saying that RR tasks don't get throttled in the > current code? That sounds like a bug to me.
Good. Thats what I wanted to hear after all these justifications that the system is just behaving as designed.
